<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Buggedtech - Open Source &#38; Other Geeky Stuffs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buggedtech.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buggedtech.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 15:00:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Another way to rank in Google local search</title>
		<link>http://www.buggedtech.com/2011/03/01/another-way-to-rank-in-google-local-search/</link>
		<comments>http://www.buggedtech.com/2011/03/01/another-way-to-rank-in-google-local-search/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 12:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>buggedtech</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google-local]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo-local]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buggedtech.com/?p=161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An interesting article on SearchEngineLand says something about another way to rank in local listings: write books. The rationale is that since Google has invested a lot into Google Book Search, it makes sense that a citation in books about &#8230; <a href="http://www.buggedtech.com/2011/03/01/another-way-to-rank-in-google-local-search/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting article on SearchEngineLand says something about another way to rank in local listings: write books.</p>
<p>The rationale is that since Google has invested a lot into Google Book Search, it makes sense that a citation in books about a business could be part of Google&#8217;s ranking algorithm.</p>
<p><a href="http://searchengineland.com/a-local-search-marketing-tactic-thats-one-for-the-books-65541<br />
">Read more…</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buggedtech.com/2011/03/01/another-way-to-rank-in-google-local-search/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nine traits of the veteran Unix admin</title>
		<link>http://www.buggedtech.com/2011/02/28/nine-traits-of-the-veteran-unix-admin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.buggedtech.com/2011/02/28/nine-traits-of-the-veteran-unix-admin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 14:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>buggedtech</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unix-admin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unix-geek]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buggedtech.com/?p=158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Though I cannot consider myself a Unix veteran having only worked around 5 years on Unix-like systems, I admire the hardworking Unix veteran geek. I try to understand why they seem arrogant at times. I hope to be one day &#8230; <a href="http://www.buggedtech.com/2011/02/28/nine-traits-of-the-veteran-unix-admin/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.buggedtech.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/unix_geek.jpg"><img src="http://www.buggedtech.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/unix_geek.jpg" alt="" title="Unix Geek" width="267" height="401" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-163" /></a></p>
<p>Though I cannot consider myself a Unix veteran having only worked around 5 years on Unix-like systems, I admire the hardworking Unix veteran geek. I try to understand why they seem arrogant at times. I hope to be one day be like them…except that I would want to be a customer centric Unix geek.</p>
<p>In summary, here are their traits:</p>
<ul>
<li>Veteran Unix admin trait No. 1: We don&#8217;t use sudo</li>
<li>Veteran Unix admin trait No. 2: We use vi, not emacs, and definitely not pico or nano</li>
<li>Veteran Unix admin trait No. 3: We wield regular expressions like weapons</li>
<li>Veteran Unix admin trait No. 4: We&#8217;re inherently lazy</li>
<li>Veteran Unix admin trait No. 5: We prefer elegant solutions</li>
<li>Veteran Unix admin trait No. 6: We generally assume the problem is with whomever is asking the question</li>
<li>Veteran Unix admin trait No. 7: We have more in common with medical examiners than doctors</li>
<li>Veteran Unix admin trait No. 8: We know more about Windows than we&#8217;ll ever let on</li>
<li>Veteran Unix admin trait No. 9: Rebooting is almost never an option</li>
</ul>
<p>See the full post of <a href="http://www.infoworld.com/t/unix/nine-traits-the-veteran-unix-admin-276">Paul Venezia from InfoWorld</a>.</p>
<p>Photo Credits: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/avocadosaurus/">avocadosaurus</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buggedtech.com/2011/02/28/nine-traits-of-the-veteran-unix-admin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google&#8217;s real stand on paid links issue</title>
		<link>http://www.buggedtech.com/2011/02/28/googles-real-stand-on-paid-links-issue/</link>
		<comments>http://www.buggedtech.com/2011/02/28/googles-real-stand-on-paid-links-issue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 13:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>buggedtech</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paid-links]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buggedtech.com/?p=155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google&#8217;s only allowed links is a non-paid links. Even if you say that you are linking back to the advertiser&#8217;s site, it is still your responsibility as a site owner not to add a vote to that advertiser&#8217;s site. Otherwise, &#8230; <a href="http://www.buggedtech.com/2011/02/28/googles-real-stand-on-paid-links-issue/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.buggedtech.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/no_paid_links.jpg"><img src="http://www.buggedtech.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/no_paid_links.jpg" alt="" title="No Paid Links Allowed!" width="300" height="250" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-165" /></a></p>
<p>Google&#8217;s only allowed links is a non-paid links. Even if you say that you are linking back to the advertiser&#8217;s site, it is still your responsibility as a site owner not to add a vote to that advertiser&#8217;s site. Otherwise, you&#8217;ll get penalized.</p>
<p>Just like what I advocated while still an in-house SEO, NOT putting a rel=&#8221;nofollow&#8221; to an advertised link will harm your site. At that time, I am a one man team and nowhere could I see references of what&#8217;s really Google&#8217;s stand on the paid link issue. Will they penalize a site for linking back to an advertiser? I discussed my views to the owner. </p>
<p>To be exact though, I originally recommended putting an exception to some sites that passed some of our internal criteria (but we will not tell the site owners) but good thing that my boss told me if we are to put rel=&#8221;nofollow&#8221;, we should do it for all or not use it at all.</p>
<p>Just look at the recent <a href="http://searchengineland.com/googles-action-against-link-schemes-continues-overstock-com-and-forbes-com-latest-casualities-conductor-exits-business-65926">penalty by Google on JC Penny, et al</a>.</p>
<p>Photo Credits: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/28288673@N07/">ivanpw</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buggedtech.com/2011/02/28/googles-real-stand-on-paid-links-issue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google&#8217;s Native Client for x86 binaries: Will this rival Java?</title>
		<link>http://www.buggedtech.com/2011/02/28/googles-native-client-for-x86-binaries-will-this-rival-java/</link>
		<comments>http://www.buggedtech.com/2011/02/28/googles-native-client-for-x86-binaries-will-this-rival-java/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 13:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>buggedtech</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google-native-binary-client]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nacl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buggedtech.com/?p=153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow, Google is developing what they call a Native Client for x86 binaries wherein like a java applet, it runs from the client side but with the advantage of running it in the real CPU&#8230;unlike Java which has to run &#8230; <a href="http://www.buggedtech.com/2011/02/28/googles-native-client-for-x86-binaries-will-this-rival-java/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, Google is developing what they call a Native Client for x86 binaries wherein like a java applet, it runs from the client side but with the advantage of running it in the real CPU&#8230;unlike Java which has to run inside a JVM. With Oracle&#8217;s support to client side java questionable, this is more an opportunity for them to take the lead into pushing a java-like alternative. A better alternative if you will.</p>
<p>Interesting right? <a href="http://www.infoworld.com/d/application-development/inside-google-native-client-x86-binaries-515-0">Read more&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buggedtech.com/2011/02/28/googles-native-client-for-x86-binaries-will-this-rival-java/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flash-based solid-state drives nearly impossible to erase?</title>
		<link>http://www.buggedtech.com/2011/02/28/flash-based-solid-state-drives-nearly-impossible-to-erase/</link>
		<comments>http://www.buggedtech.com/2011/02/28/flash-based-solid-state-drives-nearly-impossible-to-erase/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 12:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>buggedtech</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hard-drives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hdd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solid-state-drives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buggedtech.com/?p=150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Think you got rid of that confidential information on your SSD? The results of a new study will come as a rude awakening&#8230; Erasing an entire SSD hard drive is difficult When the researchers used the drive&#8217;s built in &#8220;Erase &#8230; <a href="http://www.buggedtech.com/2011/02/28/flash-based-solid-state-drives-nearly-impossible-to-erase/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Think you got rid of that confidential information on your SSD? The results of a new study will come as a rude awakening&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>
Erasing an entire SSD hard drive is difficult</p>
<p>When the researchers used the drive&#8217;s built in &#8220;Erase Unit&#8221; command &#8212; that&#8217;s a legacy ATA-era command and it doesn&#8217;t work on USB drives &#8212; of the twelve SSDs tested, only four were completely erased. (One of the drives is automatically encrypted, so they couldn&#8217;t tell if it was erased properly or not.) One of the drives reported it had been erased when, in fact, all of its data was immediately accessible. #FAIL.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Read <a href="http://www.infoworld.com/t/solid-state-drives/flash-based-solid-state-drives-nearly-impossible-erase-263">more about it</a>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buggedtech.com/2011/02/28/flash-based-solid-state-drives-nearly-impossible-to-erase/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What has happened since Oracle purchased Sun?</title>
		<link>http://www.buggedtech.com/2011/02/28/what-has-happened-since-oracle-purchased-sun/</link>
		<comments>http://www.buggedtech.com/2011/02/28/what-has-happened-since-oracle-purchased-sun/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 12:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>buggedtech</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[company-news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oracle-sun]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buggedtech.com/?p=134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are you curious as I am as to what happened to Sun products under the management of Oracle? Sure, they had been hit by criticisms from the Open Source community regarding their treatment of major open source company sponsored products. &#8230; <a href="http://www.buggedtech.com/2011/02/28/what-has-happened-since-oracle-purchased-sun/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you curious as I am as to what happened to Sun products under the management of Oracle? Sure, they had been hit by criticisms from the Open Source community regarding their treatment of major open source company sponsored products. Notable of late is the <a href="http://weblogs.java.net/blog/johnsmart/archive/2011/02/16/jenkins-and-hudson-butler-wars">issue sorrounding Hudson Continuous integration which resulted into the Jenkins fork</a> and the <a href="http://blogs.apache.org/foundation/entry/the_asf_resigns_from_the">resignation of Apache Foundation from the JCP Executive Committee</a>. But one thing is certain: they are better than Sun in terms of business viability…</p>
<p>Read more <a href="http://www.infoworld.com/d/the-industry-standard/year-later-has-oracle-ruined-or-saved-sun-748">about it…</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buggedtech.com/2011/02/28/what-has-happened-since-oracle-purchased-sun/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>scuttle as a delicious bookmark alternative hosted on your site</title>
		<link>http://www.buggedtech.com/2011/02/09/scuttle-as-a-delicious-bookmark-alternative-hosted-on-your-site/</link>
		<comments>http://www.buggedtech.com/2011/02/09/scuttle-as-a-delicious-bookmark-alternative-hosted-on-your-site/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 02:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>buggedtech</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[open-source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quick hack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bookmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scuttle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buggedtech.com/?p=137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love delicious and have stored a lot of useful resources there (more than 2,000+) that I started to look for alternatives…that can be hosted in my site. I want a long term solution without me having to pay for it that the natural thing to do is search from the open source world which led me to scuttle <a href="http://www.buggedtech.com/2011/02/09/scuttle-as-a-delicious-bookmark-alternative-hosted-on-your-site/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last December 2010, I got worried of <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=yahoo+to+retire+delicious&#038;btnG=Search&#038;hl=en&#038;sa=2">Yahoo retiring several of it&#8217;s web properties</a> including their bookmarking site delicious.</p>
<p>I love delicious and have stored a lot of useful resources there (more than 2,000+) that I started to look for alternatives…that can be hosted in my site. I want a long term solution without me having to pay for it that the natural thing to do is search from the <a href="http://alternativeto.net/software/scuttle">open source world</a> which led me to <a href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/scuttle/">scuttle</a>.</p>
<p>Installation is fairly easy: </p>
<ul>
<li>change config.inc.php.example to config.inc.php, edit the necessary details</li>
<li>put-up the sql database</li>
<li>Define an <a href="http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mod/mod_alias.html#alias">alias to my apache vhost</a> and reload</li>
</ul>
<p>…you&#8217;re done.</p>
<p>Now, since I don&#8217;t want to others to register an account in my bookmark, I did some quick hack after I created an account:</p>
<ul>
<li>comment out the register section in templates/about.tpl.php</li>
<li>delete or archive templates/about.tpl.php and replace it with an empty php page</li>
</ul>
<p>That&#8217;s it! Then, I imported my <a href="https://api.del.icio.us/v1/posts/all">bookmarks from delicious</a> (take note it won&#8217;t work in Chrome) and save the corresponding xml output to file. Check out my <a href="http://www.buggedtech.com/bookmark">bookmark</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buggedtech.com/2011/02/09/scuttle-as-a-delicious-bookmark-alternative-hosted-on-your-site/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>quickpost: installing &#8216;make&#8217; in centos/rhel</title>
		<link>http://www.buggedtech.com/2011/02/02/quickpost-installing-make-in-centosrhel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.buggedtech.com/2011/02/02/quickpost-installing-make-in-centosrhel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 14:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>buggedtech</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[command line]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[installation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[make]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open-source]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buggedtech.com/?p=124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["make: command not found" in CentOS5/RHEL5? No problem. Read the quickpost on what to do. <a href="http://www.buggedtech.com/2011/02/02/quickpost-installing-make-in-centosrhel/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just in case you are in a middle of installing an open source code and got surprised by &#8220;make: command not found&#8221;, fire up the command:</p>
<blockquote><p>
yum -y install gcc automake autoconf libtool make
</p></blockquote>
<p>Thanks to <a href="http://www.php.ph/2007/12/24/centos-5-make-command-not-found/">php.ph</a> for the tip! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buggedtech.com/2011/02/02/quickpost-installing-make-in-centosrhel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PERL one-liner approach to solving &#8220;ssh host key verification failure&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.buggedtech.com/2011/01/28/perl-one-liner-approach-to-solving-ssh-host-key-verification-failure/</link>
		<comments>http://www.buggedtech.com/2011/01/28/perl-one-liner-approach-to-solving-ssh-host-key-verification-failure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 15:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>buggedtech</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[quick hack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[perl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[perl one liner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ssh]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buggedtech.com/?p=127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m always annoyed by the ssh warning below when a hostname has changed ip, you reformatted the OS or anything that would change the fingerprint of the machine: Focus on this part: Add correct host key in /home/icasimpan/.ssh/known_hosts to get &#8230; <a href="http://www.buggedtech.com/2011/01/28/perl-one-liner-approach-to-solving-ssh-host-key-verification-failure/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m always annoyed by the ssh warning below when a hostname has changed ip,<br />
you reformatted the OS or anything that would change the fingerprint of the<br />
machine:</p>
<p><div id="attachment_131" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 592px"><a href="http://www.buggedtech.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/ssh_key_failure_01.png"><img src="http://www.buggedtech.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/ssh_key_failure_01.png" alt="ssh hist key verification failure" title="SSH Host Key Verification Failure" width="582" height="280" class="size-full wp-image-131" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">SSH Host Key Verification Failure</p></div><br />
Focus on this part:</p>
<blockquote><p>
Add correct host key in /home/icasimpan/.ssh/known_hosts to get rid of this message.<br />
Offending key in /home/icasimpan/.ssh/known_hosts:61
</p></blockquote>
<p>My usual approach is either:</p>
<ul>
<li>to completely remove the known_hosts file</li>
<li>open known_hosts via vi and go to line 61 and delete the line</li>
</ul>
<p>The first approach, though it will only take you one command, has a side effect<br />
of deleting all the known_hosts file which means, you have to manually answer &#8220;yes&#8221;<br />
again to all the hosts you connect to…</p>
<blockquote><p>
The authenticity of host &#8216;theirdomain.tld.local (::1)&#8217; can&#8217;t be established.<br />
RSA key fingerprint is e8:1f:f0:96:9c:ce:ad:b2:e6:60:e5:63:14:f6:2f:cf.<br />
Are you sure you want to continue connecting (yes/no)?
</p></blockquote>
<p>yet another hassle.</p>
<p>My second approach would take you 5 steps:</p>
<ol>
<li>Open the file</li>
<li>Search the line</li>
<li>Delete the line</li>
<li>Save your changes</li>
<li>Quit the editor</li>
</ol>
<p>I search for another solution and found this simple perl one liner to delete a line:<br />
Thanks to <a href="http://forums.devshed.com/showpost.php?p=2028119&#038;postcount=2">ishnid on devshed.com</a></p>
<blockquote><p>
   perl -ni -e &#8216;print unless /pattern/&#8217; /path/to/filename
</p></blockquote>
<p>To translate this to the example above, your actual command will become:</p>
<blockquote><p>
   perl -ni -e &#8216;print unless /yourdomain.tld/&#8217; /home/icasimpan/.ssh/known_hosts
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buggedtech.com/2011/01/28/perl-one-liner-approach-to-solving-ssh-host-key-verification-failure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Changing MacOSX Boot Image</title>
		<link>http://www.buggedtech.com/2011/01/26/changing-macosx-boot-image/</link>
		<comments>http://www.buggedtech.com/2011/01/26/changing-macosx-boot-image/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 04:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>buggedtech</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[macintosh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac-hack]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buggedtech.com/?p=92</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tired of the old Mac OSX image? Checkout BootXChanger. BootXChanger is a free tool that&#8217;s very easy to use. You just launch it and drag a new image onto its window and click &#8220;Apply.&#8221; Restart your computer and you&#8217;ll see &#8230; <a href="http://www.buggedtech.com/2011/01/26/changing-macosx-boot-image/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tired of the old Mac OSX image? <div id="attachment_122" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 326px"><a href="http://www.buggedtech.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/OSX_boot_image.png"><img src="http://www.buggedtech.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/OSX_boot_image.png" alt="Traditional OSX Boot Image" title="OSX_boot_image" width="316" height="238" class="size-full wp-image-122" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Traditional OSX Boot Image</p></div></p>
<p>Checkout BootXChanger. </p>
<blockquote><p>
BootXChanger is a free tool that&#8217;s very easy to use. You just launch it and drag a new image onto its window and click &#8220;Apply.&#8221; Restart your computer and you&#8217;ll see your new image while Mac OS X starts up.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Intesested? <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5741520/bootxchanger-customizes-your-mac-os-x-boot-screen">Read more on lifehacker&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buggedtech.com/2011/01/26/changing-macosx-boot-image/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

